Linguistic differences between male and female speeches



In the article, the authors explore the importance of linguistic differences between male and female speech.

Keywords: linguistic, gender difference in linguistics, linguistic and its application.

Linguistics is the scientific study of language, dedicated to systematic examination of language's form, structure, meaning, and context. Its foundational goal is to provide an empirical and objective explanation of the language nature as it manifests in real-world contexts. Linguists are engaged in systematic observation and analysis of languages to describe their characteristics, leading to the development of theories and explanations based on these empirical observations (Chomsky, 1957).

Ancient civilizations such as Mesopotamia, Ancient Greece, and India played a pivotal role in shaping early linguistics systems. Mesopotamia, for instance, pioneered using cuneiform writing on clay tablets around 3,000 years ago to document their spoken languages, like Sumerian and Akkadian (Izre'el & Cohen, 2004; Campbell, 2002). In Ancient Greece, the invention of the Greek alphabet in the 8th century BCE revolutionized written communication, with Classical Greek during the 5th to 4th centuries BCE marking a period of linguistic refinement. Similarly, in India, the emergence of Sanskrit as a sophisticated language was supported by the development of the Brahmi script around the 3rd century BCE (Campbell, 2002; Van Rooy, 2020).

Throughout history, scholars in these civilizations demonstrated a keen interest in preserving and understanding languages. For instance, in Mesopotamia, grammatical rules were developed to interpret older texts when Sumerian was replaced by Akkadian (Campbell, 2002). In India, scholars devised grammatical techniques, including comparisons between different recitations of Vedic texts, to ensure precise verbal performance for religious rituals (Kulikov, 2013). In Greece, philosophers like Plato and Aristotle engaged in profound discussions on language's origins, parts of speech, and the relationship between words and meanings, contributing to fundamental linguistic concepts such as morphology and the language-thought nexus (Van Rooy, 2020).

This tradition explored fundamental linguistic concepts still relevant today, such as word structure (morphology) and the connection between language and thought. These linguistic developments in ancient civilizations laid the foundation for grammatical analysis, phonetics, semantics, and syntax (Campbell, 2002). The legacy of these linguistic developments endured, influencing subsequent waves of language study. From the 12th century onward, a renewed focus on dialectics and logic emerged in linguistic inquiry. Scholars like the Modistae in Paris integrated grammar with philosophy, seeking to elucidate how language reflects conceptual understanding of the world. Their approach highlighted a universal structure in language, underscoring the intricate relationship between grammar, cognition, and reality (Campbell, 2002).

Modern linguistics underwent a transformative phase in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Instead of mostly looking at how languages evolved over time, linguists started focusing on studying languages as structured systems existing at specific points in time. This paradigm shift was notably influenced by figures such as Ferdinand de Saussure, a Swiss linguist. His ideas about the underlying structure of language (called langue) and actual speech (parole) were particularly influential in shaping new ways of thinking about language. And this concepts significantly influenced linguistic theory not only in Europe and America but globally as well (Saussure, 1916). Overall, the rules and insights established by scholars throughout history continue to be foundational in contemporary linguistic studies, shaping our understanding of language's intricacies and its profound impact on human communication and cognition.

Today, linguistics has expanded into various areas like sociolinguistics (study of language in society), psycholinguistics (study of language and the mind), computational linguistics (using computers to analyze language), and neurolinguistics (studying how the brain processes language) (Campbell, 2002). These advancements continue to deepen our understanding of human language and communication.

In the midst of growing interest in linguistics, scholars began exploring how language varies and is used by man and women. However, comprehensive research on this topic did not emerge until the late 1990s, as noted by Grey. The exploration of gender-specific linguistic behaviors began in the 1970s, notably highlighted by Lakoff's ground-breaking concept of «women's language» in her book «Language and Women's Place». Robin Lakoff stands out as the main scholar who introduced the concept of gender distinctions in linguistics (Lakoff, 1975). The scholar identified specific attributes characterizing women's speech, hyper-formal and hyper-polite, contrasting it with the more straightforward and assertive communication style often associated with men. Her theory initiated extensive discussions and investigations in the linguistic realm, prompting deeper analysis and examination.

These differences expanded beyond language, encompassing psychological and physiological aspects. For instance, Eisenmen (1997) observed that women often exhibit better memory capabilities compared to men. Urchida (1992) introduced the “difference theory”, also known as “two cultured theory” and “dominance theory”. According to the difference theory, man and women of the same age, inhabit different cultural contexts, influencing their linguistic expressions. Despite sharing same physical environment, man and women establish different relationship with society, mirroring membership in separate cultural contexts. Consequently, cross-gender communication is present and should be carefully considered. The dominance theory, also termed as power-based theory, highlights gender divisions and male dominance as influential factors in shaping cultural and linguistic environments differently (Urchida, 1992).

Tannen (1990) emphasized in her work that males typically prioritize status and independence in their communication, while females tend to prioritize connection and intimacy. This perspective is well-known and significant in linguistics, as it has been influential in understanding the nuances of gendered communication styles and patterns. This perspective aligns with Climate (1997), who asserted that women tend to utilize more standard language, compared to man, using speech to foster or deepen interpersonal connections and intimacy.

In addition to the mentioned theories, according to Graddol & Swann (1989), language is a 'social phenomenon' that exists beyond individual selves. This suggests that language is influenced by social factors, particularly its immediate environment. Linguist Curran also suggests that “Language is a medium of socialization. Essentially as a child learns the language of his or her culture, he or she is also learning how to think and behave as a member of that culture” (1995:146), highlighting direct connection between language and society. Overall these scholars emphasize that language is influenced by socialization. From early stages of life, both genders learn societal expectations and adopt behaviors associated with gender roles, encompassing traits considered masculine and feminine».

Differences in speech between genders affect not only everyday life but also the professional. These differences impact every aspect or field where man and women use language. According to Köhler (2008), males and females employ distinct speech strategies in managing people and issuing orders. Men typically use direct and assertive demands, while women often adopt a softer approach.

Language is the main thing through which individuals articulate their thoughts and express themselves. And phenomenon of gendered language plays a significant role not only in linguistics, but also across disciplines like psychology, philosophy, social science, education and media. (Eckert and McConnell-Ginet, 2003). For instance, gendered language phenomena have significant implications, including educational systems, by giving more inclusive learning environments for different genders.

This awareness also can improve communication dynamics within the workplace, as highlighted by Deborah Tannen, a prominent scholar in gender linguistic differences (1990). Tannen's research show distinct communication styles between genders, whereas, women often prioritize rapport-building and empathetic connections and men may emphasize status and assertiveness. These distinctions can lead to miscommunication, especially in hierarchical workplace environments where collaborative decision-making by women contrasts with men's more competitive styles. Scholar also discusses how the gender linguistic variations affect perceptions of leadership and authority, impacting women in leadership roles.

The research underscores the important role of language in interpersonal relationships, highlighting how communication patterns and linguistic differences may impact the dynamics of romantic relationship, friendships. For example, in romantic relationships, language is used to express affection, resolve disagreements, and negotiate intimacy. The linguistic differences between man and women, such as tone, choice of words, and conversational strategies, can influence relationship dynamics and the perception of emotional closeness. For instance, discussing plans for a date night, man may use more direct approach with practical and logical details, while women prefer indirect speech with more romantic context, emphasizing emotions. (Tannen, 1990).

Another field where awareness of gendered language can also help is healthcare. Healthcare professionals can use gender-inclusive language when discussing medical conditions, treatment options, and healthcare decisions with patients. (Eckert and McConnell-Ginet, 2003). Similarly, understanding linguistic gender differences is relevant in media content creation, storytelling, and marketing campaigns, where knowledge of how genders accept information and express themselves can inform effective strategies.

Overall, linguistic differences between male and female speeches have been a longstanding topic of research. All the scholars’ highlights the significance of comprehending how gender language differences contribute to diverse communication styles, social dynamics, and identity formation based on gender. Practical applications of understanding linguistic gender differences is beneficial across diverse settings, promoting inclusivity, fairness, and effective communication in education, workplace, healthcare, legal contexts, interpersonal relationships, media, and cultural representations. In essence, acknowledging and dealing with linguistic gender disparities is crucial for promoting diversity, understanding social dynamics, and fostering effective communication across various fields where different genders are involved.

References:

1. Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic Structures. The Hague/Paris: Mouton.
2. Izre'el, S., & Cohen, E. (2004). Literary Old Babylonian. LINCOM EUROPA. LINCOM GmbH.
3. Campbell, L. (2002). The history of linguistics. In M. Aronoff & J. Rees-Miller (Eds.), The Handbook of Linguistics (pp. 1–14). Blackwell Publishing. Retrieved from [https://www.blackwellpublishing.com/content/BPL_Images/Content_store/WWW_Content/9781405102520/04.pdf]
4. Van Rooy, R. (2020). Greece’s labyrinth of language: A study in the early modern discovery of dialect diversity (History and Philosophy of the Language Sciences 2). Berlin: Language Science Press.
5. Kulikov, L. (2013). Language vs. grammatical tradition in Ancient India: How real was Pāṇinian Sanskrit? Folia Linguistica Historica, 34. [https://doi.org/10.1515/flih.2013.003]
6. Saussure, F. de. (1916). Cours de linguistique générale [Course in General Linguistics]. Lausanne: Payot.
7. Grey, C. (1998). Towards an overview on gender and language variation. Retrieved November 21, 2006, from [http://www.eche.ac.uk/study/schsubj/human/English/rh/modules/337–1.htm]
8. Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and women’s place. New York, NY: Harper and Row
9. Eisenman, R. (1997). Men, women and gender differences: the attitudes of three feminists — Gloria Steinem, Gloria Allred and Bella Azbug.
10. Uchida, A. (1992). When difference is dominance: A critique of the anti-power-based cultural approach to gender differences. Language in Society, 21, 547–568.
11. Tannen, D. (1990). You just don’t understand: Women and men in conversation. New York: William Morrow.
12. Climate, C. (1997). Men and women talking: The differential use of speech and language by gender.
13. Graddol, G., & Swan, J. (1989). Gender Voice. Oxford: Blackwell Ltd
14. Curran, D. J. (1995). Women, Men, and Society. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. Retrieved from https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:415214/FULLTEXT01.pdf
15. Köhler, A. (2008). Gender and Language. From: [http://books.google.com.hk/books?id=Wv4YyPTDQWMC&lpg=PP1&ots=-SBveTFMl&dq=K %C3 %B6hler %2C %20A. %20(2008) %20Gender %20and %20Language.&hl=zh-CN&pg=PP1#v=onepage&q&f=false]
16. Eckert, P., & McConnell-Ginet, S. (2003). Language and gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.